A GUIDE FOR THE HEXED:
THE OLD THEODICY OF THE NEW BOHEMIANS DEBUNKED
(FREE WILL AND THE PROBLEM OF EVIL)
"That great Kabbilistical association known in Europe under
the name of Masonry appeared suddenly in the world when the
revolt against the Church had just succeeded in dismembering
Christian unity." -- Eliphas Levi, Freemason, black magician
and Cabalist, author of "Trancendental Magic", "Mysteries of
the Qabalah", and "The History of Magic", from whence this
quote was derived, page 283, here notes that Freemasonry is
a Cabalist institution and suggests that it became public in
consequence of the wreckage of Christian unity that followed
in the wake of the Reformation, which it likely had no small
part in effecting in this author's opinion.
Now at last we approach the end of this discourse, where, after
considering the genesis and eschaton of Solomon's Seal, we look
not to the end or beginning, but rather to the Great Divide, or
what is called the Great Schism, which is the heart of things,
the crux of the matter, the dividing line, where we must each
take sides as the battle lines are drawn. It's here, as
a matter of historical record, that swords crossed and
armies clashed in days of old, where so many brave souls fell
on either side of this deep divide, so that we can only marvel
in deep sadness at the carnage and shudder to think of the
carnage that may yet ensue.
Those too disheartened to make it to this demarcation point
may be lost already, unless we can revive their hope in God,
so that they will fight like good soldiers of Jesus Christ, and
to that end, this ending. Let us leap, then, into the great
and awful chasm, Helm's Deep, so to speak, where many a soul
lost heart, but in any case, where the fighting must be done
if truth be found.
There is something deeply confusing and disheartening about the
Great Schism between Catholics and Protestants, which began with
the Bohemian Hussites. Jesus Christ called His followers to
unity, yet never again would there be even a semblance of unity
in the Christian world. One can say, quite truly, that the
Protestant rebellions never broke the unity of the Catholic
Church but rather broke away from that unity, yet even so, if we grant
that view, the confusion and disillusionment remain,
even among many Catholics, creating a powerful
undercurrent of doubt, threatening to pull even Catholics
into the abyss of despair. Perhaps the break didn't destroy Catholic
unity, but in any case, it certainly broke Catholicism's hold
on the Western World, and with it, arguably, the levy that held back the
flood of Satanic filth.
Perhaps all that's needed is to understand the true meaning of
the banners that are being unfurled in the wind. Already we
know the beginning and end, but what side to take now is our doubt,
our dilemma, our destiny; this is not a fight for the world
but for the souls assembled in the fog of this diabolic darkness.
In this battle, the end is
known, but our own is not, and that is always the real battle--
to know what side to take, what road to travel, which way to
go, for there is only one way away from evil in this labyrinth,
and behold, all the forces of darkness are arrayed against us,
and whichever side we take, the fallen angels seek to take us down.
For "fiery the angels fell;
deep thunder rolled around their shoulders, burning with the fires of
Ork", and so, we are told, like blazing stars, the evil angels fell
to earth to decieve the nations. Therefore, let us consider more closely,
most carefully,
these banners
arrayed before us, unfurled like riddles in winds that howl through
Helm's Deep.
To keep heart, to have faith, to keep seeking truth, this
pearl is in my pocket, as if it were a cipher:
"He [God] does not willingly bring grief or suffering upon the children
of men." -- Lamenations 3:33, The Holy Bible
[Italics mine.] With this cipher, this promise, also in my breast
pocket:
"The Sefer Zohar said that Kabbalah illuminates dualism, the idea
that Good and Evil are locked in mortal combat throughout the universe,
and it called this supernatural, evil force the Sitra Ahra ('the
other side'). Don't think that George Lucas hadn't read a little
Kabbalah before making Darth Vader and Obi Wan Kenobi opposite sides
of the Force. But the Sitra Ahra exists not to fight God; it was
created by God to give man the free will to choose between good and
evil." (Freemasons for Dummies, Christopher Hodapp, 32nd Degree
Post Master, Knight Templar, page 167)
[
Hodapp's claim that Kabbalah
teaches that good and evil are engaged in mortal combat is misleading;
as the movie Star Wars,
Revenge of the Sith, attests, the purpose of
Kabbalah is to balence or harmonize good and evil, not to destroy
(win mortal combat) against evil, in which case the "mortal combat" is
in fact a bloody and benighted mystical charade, but, in any case, point here is simply that
Kabbalah teaches that the God of the Kabbalah, or The Force, has a good
and evil side. The Kabbalah teaches what Hollywood teaches: life devoid
of evil would be dull, cheap, and meaningless, so evil is good, and it
would be bad for the box office to do away with evil, so evil must be
preserved and harmonized with good at any cost, even the cost of real
blood.]
To deny the reality of free will, as the Muslims, Bohemians, Lutherans,
Calvinists do, logically implies that evil is necessary as part
of God's will, because, in that case, every choice that any created
being makes is ultimately God's will manifesting through a created
being. After all, in that case, there
is no other will that can act contrary to God's will, so that every
evil choice of any created being must ultimately be attributed to
God. Thus the Catholic historian, Hillaire Bulloc, compared Calvinism
to Moloch worship:
"Though the iron Calvinist affirmations (the core
of which was an admission of evil into the Divine
nature by the permission of but One Will in the
universe) have rusted away, yet his vision of a
Moloch God remains..." (Hillaire Belloc, "The Great Heresies")
By admission of evil into the Divine nature, the dogma of the
slave will logically entails the Kabbalist view of God, which holds
that God has both a good and an evil side. This Qabalist dualism
is symbolically represented by Solomon's Seal,
the tell-all talisman of Solomonic magia and the "geometrical synthesis
of the whole occult doctrine", according to Dr. John Dee, the notorious
Qabalist and sorceror, who was the
court astrologist of Queen Elizabeth I of England.
But to claim, on the other hand, as the Freemasons do, that free
will exists, that evil must likewise exist because
free will is impossible without it, likewise implies that the
existence of evil is God's will, because, in that case, evil was
supposedly created by God so that created beings could freely
choose between good and evil.
The Catholic view, if I understand it correctly, holds, to the contrary,
that although God did indeed create evil, as is plainly stated in the
Bible, He did so reluctantly, not willingly in one sense, but only as a
necessary response to the evil choices of men, who were given free will,
i.e., the power to act as autonomous and independent beings with the
capacity, therefore, to act contrary to God's will.
From a Christian perspective, the Masonic view that evil is neeeful
for free choice fails to explain how created
beings could be free prior
to the fall, or how they can remain free after the Second Coming
of Jesus Christ, when He will "destroy the works of the devil",
i.e., all evil.
If evil is a necessary condition of free choice, how did God freely
choose to create the world, or how could His creatures freely
choose evil in the pre-fallen world devoid of evil?
In either case, then, evil is made to appear needful, necessary,
and part of God's will. Evil is seen as relative
to good, necessary for good, so that evil is justified and seen
as something desireable, not something that should be utterly
opposed and rooted out. Thus, although these two seemingly
opposite views differ in that one denies free will, whereas the
other view, that of the Kabbalist Freemasons, affirms the reality of
free will, both are essencially occult dogmas because they
logically imply that God is both good and evil, and that is
a kabbalist, not a Christian, view of God. For in either case,
God not only created evil, but the evil that He created did not
arise contrary to His will, but rather because He pre-ordained,
predestined, and purposed it, perhaps due to the "secret council
of God", as Calvin put it, or because evil is a necessary condition
of free will, as the Kabbalists have it.
According to the Calivinist and Bohemian view, which is also the
Muslim view of God, the Devil is God's hit man, demons are God's
errand boys, and no created being, whether demon or human, can act
contrary to God's sovereign will any more than a puppet can
act independently of the puppet master. Thus evil can only be
seen as God's good will. It makes no more sense to blame created
beings for evil, in that case, that it would to blame a puppet
for knocking down a glass of milk; the puppet's master is the one
pulling the strings. It's that simple, despite the attempts
by Calvinists to mystify and befuddle the issue and obscure the
obvious.
Likewise, according to the seemingly opposite view, that of the
Freemasons and Kabbalists, evil is necessary
because God wills that humans have freedom to choose between good
and evil, where the spurious assumption, which has no Biblical
basis, or at least none that I can see, remains, as always, that
created beings cannot enjoy free will in the abscence of evil.
Are we to believe, then, that when Jesus destroys all evil, free
will will cease to exist? Are we to think that prior to the fall
created beings were not free? If not, then how can created beings
be blamed for the fall?
To give evil a purpose, to make senseless suffering seem sensible,
is in fact to deny the reality of evil, and if so, then insofar
as these two views both purport to give purpose to evil, they are
at root identical in that they in fact try to justify the
unjustifiable, giving Satan, who is both the personification of evil
and a very real spirit of evil which rules this world for a time,
merit and meaning, purpose and praise as one who ultimately helps
God achieve His aims.
Therefore, we conclude that predestinarian Protestantism
and Freemasonry
are opposite sides of the same occult coin;
namely, the desire of Satan to exhault himself as heroic, while
making it appear as if it's only God's bedevilment and mans
that would make the Devil God's scapegoat, when in fact, according
to
Kabbalist dualism, God is ultimately and soley blameworthy
for the existence of evil because He not only planed, purposed,
and pre-ordained it, but He did so willingly because, to paraphrase
French Freemason Eliphas Levi, "the Devil is God working evil",
or, to paraphrase Freemason Lomas, "the Devil is God on a bad
day", or to parapharse Rabbi G. Dennis, "evil is God's throne".
Both views, in other words, remain essentically occult and Kabbalistic
in that they logically suggest that God is both good and evil, or
metaphorically speaking, light and dark, whereas
the Bible teaches, to the contrary: "God is light and in Him there
is no darkness at all" (1 John, The Holy Bible).
Of course, Calivnists are loathe draw out or acknowledge the
logical implications of their slave-will dogma, and they may
be sincere in their disavowals of any blasphemous view of God,
but it's quite possible, and in fact quite common, for
people to sincerely assert beliefs that contradict other beliefs
that they sincerely hold. In any case, the Catholic Church rightly
decried the slave-will dogma and declared it heretical in 1410,
according to Penny Lord, co-author of "The Tragedy of the
Protestant Reformation", and the last
of the Catholic crusades were launched against the Hussite rebels,
the Bohemian Protestant-precursors, who allegedly held to this
dogma of the slave-will.
Lastly, consider that the
inverted pentagram of the satanic
religion, which is said to represent the god of lust, but also the
god of fate insofar as astrology is based on the
premise that the stars control our destiny, logically implies
the same fatalism or predestinarianism, alibiet perhaps for different reasons,
as that which is held by the
Calvinists and Qabalists, Behaviourists and Babtists, Lutherans and Luciferians,
Presbyterians and predestinarian Muslims, not to mention Zionist Judaizers,
who mix "race with grace", teaching that certain people, the Jews, whoever they
might be, gain special unearned favor from God by virtue of their race and,
according to some in Hebrew Roots movement, earn eternal salvaiton
neither by faith nor works but by a genetically determined Divine decree, etc.
Thus, despite the very real
differences in doctrine between these varied faiths, they share an important
doctrine, one that's fundamental insfosar as it changes one's
basic view of
God and man; namely, strict predestinarianism--a theory that's not uncommon,
yet certainly not catholic (universal), nor Catholic (Roman Catholic), but
one that's well signified by what might be considered the universal
symbol of Satan, the inverted pentagram, which is known to signify, among
many other things, the god of the Kabbalah, and the god of this world, but also,
the bondage of the human will, the net cast by the stars, so to speak,
to trap mortals in the web of "outrageous fortune" or eternal doom. If this
analysis is correct, there is no better symbol to truly represent the essence
of our Protestant, Freemasonic, and Judaic nation than the inverted pentagram
that can be seen in the street structure of Washington, DC, for despite their
many very real differences, these groups share an underlying assumption, one that's
all the more powerful insofar as it remains unspoken and unconscious,
thereby becoming a powerful undercurrent, one that arguably leads many into
the abyss. In other words, they share the same guiding star,
"the star of
Remphan",
a symbolical synonym of the
Seal of Solomon, thus
marking them out, despite their differences, both real and merely apparent, as
occult at heart or in essence, i.e., double-minded, or we might say, hexed.
Evidently, the occult adepts well understood this. For example, if we
consdier the Waite-Rider Tarot deck, designed by the infamous Freemason
and Kabbalist, A.E. Waite, we see that the Death rider bears the banner
of a Rosy pentalpha, or what Waite describes as "the mystic rose", the
same symbol that the founder of the Protestant religion, Martin Luther,
used on his signet ring. The number of the card, 13, is the number of
rebellion and death, and thus the number of the Anti-Christ, and also,
one of the numbers associated with Solomon's Seal. Below the Death
rider is the Pope, who seems to beg for his life. The symbolism seems
clear to me: the Rosicrucian brotherhood, the brotherhood of the Rosy Cross,
brings death to Catholicism, via the Protestant rebellion, paving the
way for anti-christ, and causing those who are blinded by the god of
this world to adopt, unwittingly, the god of the Kabblah, or god of this
world, by denying the reality of free will. So, "death brings life", as
the Bonesmen teach, and here, as depicted on this Tarot Card, we see
the death of Catholic Christianity bringing to birth the New Age. It's
significant that Kabbalist dualism is made somewhat more explicit
because one rose
has one point up, the other has two points up, thus signifying the
equality and equilibrium of opposites, as defined in the Kabbalah and
symbolized by Solomon's Seal. In the background, we see the sun
rising, which in Qabalist context, signifies the Mashiach, whose number
is 666, the anti-Christ who will exact revenge on Christiandom, esp.
Catholic Christianity. That, at any rate, is how I would interpet
these symbols. Please see Luther's crest below.
But can one truly worship Jesus Christ if one adhere's to the dogma
of the slave will? Can one share in the single-minded passion of Jesus Christ to
overcome evil with good, to destroy the works of the Devil, and set the
captives free, insofar
as one adopts, either consciously or unconsciously, the conviction
that evil is necessary, needful, and therefore, in a sense, good
fruit? If evil is good fruit, should we not eat from the tree of
the knowledge of good AND EVIL? Should we not learn about the Kabbalist
"Tree of Life" so that we can balence good with evil?
Martin Luther, in his book, "Bondage of the Will", tells us
that the fate of the world hinges upon the issue of free will, that
those who think that there is such a thing are of the concieted and
prideful opinion that they have something to do with their own
salvation and thus deny glory which belongs to God alone, but as for me,
I think,
first, that true humiliation comes not if we deny the reality of free
will but only when, as a consequence of realizing that we do have freedom,
we realize that we alone are responsible for the evils we have wrought,
not God, and what's more, we need not take credit for our salvation
if we believe in free will, because, just as we can accept a gift in
humility, realizing that we neither give the gift, nor made it, nor
even did we give ourselves the power to accept it, yet with these
powers and gifts given to us by God, including free will, we have done
evil, so that truly, as it's written, our destruction is our doing, but
salvation is God's alone, who with His own arm brought salvation,
a gracious gift, one which God gave us power to accept
if only we will reach out, by God's grace, to take hold of it. Yet can we
truly accept or recieve forgiveness if we have never really repented? And how
do we really and truly repent if consciously, or unconsciously, we
deny the reality of free will, in which case, we refuse to blame ourselves
or other sinners for our sufferings, but instead, attribute all evil acts
and consequent sufferings to God's will?
The Bohemian rebellion was the turning point, but as the old theodicy
of the new Bohemians attests, the last great battle against the Bohemians
never ended, and the crypto-crusades of the Bohemians, Zionists,
and Freemasons rage on.
"He does not willingly bring grief or suffering upon the children of men."
-- Lamentations 3:33
Catholic).
"...the appearance that evil has an independent existence is illusionary
and all that appears 'evil' from a human perspective is in fact truly
subordinate to God, serving God's purpose in some inscrutable way. Thus
in most forms of Jewish mysticism, evil is part of Creation, a byproduct
from the 'other side', or Sitra Achra, of the divine emanation. 'Evil is
the chair for good,' as the Baal Shem Tov put it, and suffering, misfortune,
and sin are necessary part of existence. Even evil entities, such as demons,
are really subject to, and agents of, God's purpose. Thus Chasidic teaching
emphasizes that there is no absolute evil. It is common for mystics to call
demons 'destructive angels' to emphasize that they remain obedient to God in
some sense. For this reason, one can read in Jewish literature of demons
studying Torah, adhereing to Jewish law, and even helping pious Sages. It is
based on this also that a few Kabbalistic authorities say it is permitted
to summon demons in order to have them perform benificent services for
humanity." Rabbi G. W. Dennis, "The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth,
Magic, and Mysticism, page 85.
