"It was a bright day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen." -- the first line of Orwell's 1984

"Nineteen Eighty-Four is a hell without a contervailing heaven, the reign of Anti-Christ for ever, not as a preliminary to the New Jerusalem. There are no angels, only devils." (Malcolm Pittock, Bloom's Modrn Critical Interpretations, page 113)

Erich Fromm, in the Afterword of my edition of 1984, wrote: "The contribution of Orwell which is most immediately relevant..is the connection he makes between the dictatorial society of 1984 and atomic war....Orwell demonstrates the illusion of the assumption that democracy can continue to exist in a world preparing for nuclear war...."^[01] Although Fromm is right to emphasize the pivotal importance of nucleor weapons in Orwell's novel, it's not exactly the issue of nucleor war but rather that of nucleor terrorism that's raised by Orwell's book. The terrorism being perpetrated against the populace is Big Brother's doing, or so it's strongly suggested. Even the war machine, according to the dogmas of the Inner Party, exists to consume surplus goods generated by the machine-based economy, so that the hierarchical or pyramidal structure of society can be perpetuated, in which case even nucleor war is seen as serving the state and the perpetuation of the inner Party--an elite cabal at the top of the pyramid. Thus, to the inner Party, war itself is state terrorism and has no other purpose ultimately than to subjugate the people under the heavy boot of Big Brother and the Eye of the thought police. Terrorism is essencial to the elite because the whole system depends on doublethink, and doublethink, Orwell tells us, requires terror to split the personality.

Thus, via strategically induced nucleor terror, the Eye in the pyramid is preserved, and, arguably, produced. The development of the atom bomb, in contrast to the development of the musket and rifle, resulted not in an equalization of power between people and states but in the concentration of power into the hands of the few states that could understand and devolop nucleor weapons. The musket was an equalizer and the atomb bomb was elitist and anti-eqalitarian to the core; in fact, whether the modern super-state in its present dark incarnation is even possible without WMDs is dubious. In any case, the Orwellian nightmare in 1984 was precipitated not only by the development and use of atomic weapons but by a cataclysmic nucleor war. Rising from this conflaguration, the dystopia envisioned by Orwell emerged Phoenix-like from the flames, thus mimicking or manifesting the occult maxim, as echoed by Bonesmen and other fringe-Masonic fraternities, that out of death comes new life, if indeed such a horrific and monstrous incarnation of tyranny can be called "life".

So, after Orwell has gone to great lengths to show us the evils of totalitarian statism, the publishers, eager evidently to get in the last word, put in, as an afterward, their man for all reasons, the socialist, Mr. Fromm, who, attempting to justify his socialist mindset, tells us that Orwell's mission was to show us that freedom and democracy are incompatible not with

Karl Marx, Jewish radical who inspired Lenin with his communist theories, was secretly a high priest of Satan. He's seen here giving a Masonic hand sign. See Richardson's Monitor of Freemasonry, p. 74. Also see Wurmbrand's Marx & Satan and Dillon's Freemasonry as the Hidden Power Behind Communism.

the consolidation and centralization of power, per se, nor with socialism, of course, but with nations preparing for nucleor war, in which case, if such is the case, we might solve the problem by creating a globo-socialist republic, perhaps of the kind envisioned by the German Freemason, socialist, and son of Jewish Rabbi, Mr. Karl Marx. No nations would be preparing for nucleor war, in that case, because there would be only one globo-nation.

This world socialist federation is the ideal expressed, for example, by Freemason and former leader of Israel, Ben-Gurion, in an interview in Look magazine, and it's also the ideal "devoutly to be desired", as expressed by numerous influential Freemasons, e.g., Harry S. Truman, H.G. Wells, and Aleister Crowley. This is the plan publicly and plainly promoted as part of the "Open Conspiracy", as H.G. Wells called it. It's a vision that appeals to people of all classes who hope for global peace and prosperity, thus making it uniquely useful in gaining grass-roots support for breaking down nation-states and building bigger and bigger blocks or spheres of influence via the solve et coagula, i.e., break down and build, alchemical formula. But is there possibly, in the uppermost ranks of the plotters, a hidden agenda, an invisible ideology, a closed conpiracy?

In Orwell's book, even the numerology points to the importance of the pyramidal structure. There are three party slogans, three classes, and the Orwellian world is divided into three super-spy states, each of which shares the same death-cult ideology designed to preserve the pyramidic social strata of each society. Just as each super-spy state has an Eye in the triangle, so to speak, or an inner party elite, there arguably exists an international ultra-elite, which is to say, the apex of the worldwide meta-pyramid, consisting of the Big Brotherhood, i.e., a hidden transnational secret society, whose bulwark and basis consists of the aforementioned totalitarian states which provide the balence of power or equilibrium that's required to support the Eye of the pyramid: specifically, they provide the pretext for perpetual war and the consequent destruction of surplus goods. In this way, the productive capacity of the machine economy is used up without raising the general standard of living. As long as the three states remain in conflict, Orwell tells us, "they prop one another up, like three sheaves of corn". (Orwell, pg. 197) Since war and terror are viewed as absolutely necessary to preserve the status quo of the power-elite, there must always remain an enemy who can inspire terror, in which case a global democratic federation would never do, unless perhaps they could manufacture or introduce some kind of alien, other-wordly, "monster of the month", as Texe Marrs calls the necessary and nefarious peril that perpetually precludes peace. Perhaps, however, an enemy within would do.

In any case, in Orwell's novel, we can reasonably surmise the existence of an supra-national Big Brotherhood behind the perpetual warfare because, as we are told in the book supposedly written by Goldstien but actually written in part by O'Brien, the three super-states were forseen before the middle of the 20th century. Forseen by whom? Necessary for whom? Planned by whom? If the triplicity of power was forseen so early, would it be unreasonable to suppose that the need for it was also forseen, and once it was forseen, fostered? In the book supposedly written by Goldstien we are also told: "From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent the need for inequality, had disappeared....But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction--indeed, in some sense was the destruction-- of a hierarchical society." Thus long before the need for the three super states was percieved, the problem presented by the new productive capacity of the machine-based economy became apparent to those who wished to maintain the pyramidal structure of society and their elite status within it.

We are told, further, that war is necessary for the elite in each society as the only psychologically acceptable way of eliminating this threat by destroying the wealth that would otherwise be used to raise the general standard of living. While desire to perpetuate the existing status quo might explain why the elite in each society participate in a hidden agenda to preserve priviledge and power at the price of perpetual war, it cannot explain why this state of affairs, forseen so long ago, transpired. In other words, if things took their natural course, the general standard of living of all classes would improve, and since, by this account, the elite percieved the "problem" early on, knowing that it was only problematical to them, because it would eliminate the decisive advantages of their elite status, the question arises as to who prevented the natural course of events. It will not due, then, to suppose that the tri-totalitarian mega-states evolved as the natural course of events. It was exactly because the natural course of events was forseen as unacceptable that a problem presented itself to the elite in the first place, and so, we can surmise with good reason that the splitting-up of the world into three great superstates, which was forseen before the middle of the 20th century, transpired by purposeful design.

What's more, much more, as a matter of historical record, neither the European Union nor the proposed union of the Americas evolved halfhazardly but as the result of careful planning and consistent ploting and plodding by the Judeo-Masonic network. As early as 1930, Catholic priest and author, Father Fahey, predicted the rise of the European Union (Eurasia) and the establishment of the state of Israel by Judeo-Masonry. (Read Freemasonry as the Hidden Power Behind Communism by Dillon) How did the Jesuits know of the EU so many decades before it came into existence? The historical record establishes beyond doubt that they did indeed forsee what in fact did transpire because they were aware the the machinations and plans of the occult hierarchy, as they had been laid out in various Masonic blueprints, e.g., the Alta Vendita, which was co-authored by a Rothchild, according to Eustice Mullins. If, as seems to be the case, the "Invisible Empire", or what Pope Pius IX called "the synagogue of Satan", planned and proselytized and otherwise promoted this outcome, would we not be correct to call this Judeo-Masonic Empire, or Big Brotherhood, a global occult (i.e., hidden) government of sorts? Is it not also possible, or probable even, that due to Orwell's occult entanglements in corporate Freemasonry and the Golden Dawn, which was the personal coven of the English branch of the Rothchilds, according to Springmeier, Orwell understood or surmised the real agenda of the Big Brotherhood behind Big-Brotherism, and knowing their philosophy, more or less, infered what would follow logically from that?

Just as the three classes in Orwell's novel provide the basis for the Eye in the triangle within each super-state, wherein there exist three classes: 1) the proles; 2) the outer party; 3) and the inner party, so likewise the three super-states provide the basis for the Eye in the global power structure. The three classes in each society form the base of the pyramid, the topmost point of which, the apex, consists of the Big Brotherhood behind Big Brother, which is to say, point 4 is the Eye in the triangle, which is propped up by the three classes, yet if one thinks only dualy, in two dimenions, there is no fourth point--just three, where the top of the triangle is the inner party. So, likewise, the three super-states provide the basis for a global pyramid. or global occult government, which must remain hidden because the elite in each state must believe in the reality of the warfare being constantly waged, even though, at some level, they're aware of the unreality of the perpetual war. They realize, if only unconsciously, that the war is a pretense of sorts, a crime racket, or a bloody and benighted mystical charade.

Thus we are told that by means of doublethink the Party members of each state maintain a "mystical belief that the war is real". For although the combat is indeed mortal to mortals engaged in battle, the combat is unreal in the spiritual sense; that is, just as there is no intent to utterly destroy the enemy, there is no intent to destroy evil because the entire system is based on the occult paradigm which holds that evil is needful, and therefore, good. (See "The Eschatology of Solomon's Seal", Paranoia, December 2007) So, if we visualize, in 3 dimmensions, the eye in the triangle, we see that the three spy states are the basis or support needed to hold the capstone in place, so to speak, i.e., the eye in the triangle, the Big Brotherhood behind Big Brother. The fourth point of the triangle, the apex, must remain unseen from lower-levels, or from a two dimensional perspective, so to speak, because the party members must be focused on the duality of us versus them, good versus evil, white arrow versus black arrow, etc., to maintain morale.

Thus towards the end of the novel we read: "He had a map of Africa behind his eyelids. The movement of the armies was a diagram: a black arrow tearing vertically southward, and a white arrow tearing horizontally eastward, accross the tail [like an Ourobros?] of the first. As though for reassurance he looked up at the imperturbable face in the portrait. Was it conceivable that the second arrow did not exist?" Note how "the second arrow", the white one, symbolizes good, and it's the reality of this triangle that Winston doubts. At some level Winston senses the mystical charade, yet doublethink keeps him riveted on the two-dimensonal, black-white, twin-pillar pharoanic farce. This is the double-mind and the double-bind, the false dichotomy, as Craig Heimbichner has pointed out. By means of this "pharoanic fraud", says Heimbichner, the people are duped and become the pupets of the hidden elite. The Eye which sees but cannot be seen, sees the Big Picture, so to speak, but those below the Big Brotherhood remain in the dark.

Although the existence and nature of the Brotherhood is never overtly confirmed in Orwell's novel, neither is it denied. The question of its existence and nature is left open when O'Brien tells Winston that the existence of the Brotherhood will always remain a riddle in Winston's mind. The Big Brotherhood's existence is only hinted at, yet its existence, as well as its evil nature, can be infered. No overt mention can be made of it because the book is written from the perspective of Winston, O'Brien, and other characters who are caught in the snare and taken in by the subterfuge, else, possibly, blood-oath-bound and unwilling to divulge their knowledge to outsiders. To say the global governement is occult is just to say that it's hidden from the sight of plain people in plain sight, and of the few who know of it, fewer still are at liberty to share their knowledge because, after all, it's the nature of a secret society to keep secrets and of the all-seeing Eye to remain unseen. For its light is darkness, and its invincible shield is the invincible ignorance of the proles. "Science est potentia", knowledge is power, they say, yet not power under, not power to serve, but power over the people who are under the black boot of Big Brother and the all-seeing eye of the Thought Police. Seeing all, it sees nothing.

We see, then, that the process of this paradigm, whereby duality or the polarization of opposites is used to generate the Eye in the Triangle, can be emblematized by Solomon's Seal, where the two triangles represent the duality that engenders triplicity. The two triangles become three hourglass symbols. Two plus two becomes 666, i.e., two threes become six become seven. The seven, or center of the hexagram, like the fourth or top point of the pyramid, represents the Eye in the Triangle, and the whole purpose of the process of this paradigm is to produce the penultemate power, the Eye in the Triangle. Thus, when the two circles, representing oposite principles, join to produce the vesica pisces, the Eye is formed. Thus, when the two triangles of Solomon's Seal are joined, the center space, where the Eye is located, is formed. Thus in the acronym IAO, when the 'I', representing the penis, joins with the 'O' representing the vagina, the dot in the circle, the Eye is produced, which is the 'A', the cone, which, when viewed from above, looks like the dot in a circle, the retina of the Eye. And so it goes. The Process of the paradigm thus has no other purpose than to produce the pyramid's Eye, whose light is darkness, i.e., sin, in which case, since the process of yoking good with evil is simply the process of corrupting that which is good, we see how the process is not only neeful to generate the Eye but needful to give it "light", so to speak, or vision.

From a Christian and practical perspective, this practice of yoking good and evil together simply results in the corruption of good. Analogously, if we take two slabs of hamburger, one good and the other rotten, then mix them together, this makes the good meat bad and does nothing to make the bad meat good. The same tends to be true of people. Once this fact is understood, we can see how, in Orwell's 1984, Winston Smith unwittingly parots the nihilistic and satanic credo of the innermost party, as symbolized by Solomon's Seal, when, in the Golden Country, he tells his lover: "'I hate purity. I hate goodness. I don't want virtue to exist anywhere. I want everyone corrupt to the bones." That might well be the perfect summation of the purpose of Solomonic sorcery as symbolized by its tell-all talisman, the Seal of Solomon. In the Eye of evil, the only evil is seperation from evil.

(In J.R.R. Tolkien's trilogy, this same sorcerous process and purpose is expressed this way: "One Ring to rule them all, one Ring to find them; one Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them." The Ring symbolizes sin, as does Solomon's Seal, so when the Ring is destroyed, the Eye, whose light is darkness or sin, crumbles blindly into oblivion. This expresses a spiritual law as real as any law of physics. The moral: "be ye therefore seperate and touch not the unclean thing." In other words, Jesus Christ diagnosed the problem perfectly: "Those who sin are slaves, and slaves have no rights." That is, the cause of tyranny and slavery is sin, as signified by Solomon's Seal. For what is it to sin but to join oneself in some way with evil? And what is Solomonic sorcery if not the dark art of ritually, symbolically, and systematically corrupting good by yoking good to evil? The only solution to tyranny is sanctification, i.e., seperation from evil, as signified by the Catholic crucifix. The answer to 1984 is not 1776 or 1948, i.e., the year Israel was established. The answer to 1984 is timeless: "sin no more." In the end, according to the Bible, Jesus Christ will seperate the good from the evil, thus reversing the sorcery signified by the Seal of Solomon. This reversal of the process, which consists, symbolically speaking, of tearing apart the two interlocked triangles, destroys the Eye at the center of the hex. To hex is to blind; to unhex is to restore sight to the blind, to destroy the hoodwink, and thereby blind the Eye of evil, whose light is darkness, i.e., sin.)

Although the point is not explicitly drawn, everything in Orwell's novel points to the point in the circle, the Eye of the Triangle, the Crowleyian Judeo-Masonic occluded and occult closed conspiracy. So much, then, for the H.G.-Wellsian publicly promulgated "Open Conspiracy". Quite possibly, the Orwellian closed conpiracy is the real game plan and end game, or in any case, a necessary pre-requisite or stepping-stone of the occult paradigm, or so we might surmise. Those in the "Open Conspiracy", who are given to the exoteric political ideology, which promises world peace and prosperity, unwittingly serve the esoteric ideology of the closed conpiracy which seeks not peace but perpetual war and privation as the means to power. Evidently, Orwell himself had been taken in by the exoteric ideology but later awakened to the reality of the situation: "Ten years before he wrote 1984, Orwell too believed that the unfree society of the future would at any rate provide happiness: '[...] the slave-state, or rather the slave-world', which he envisaged as the probable outcome if Facism triumphed, 'would probably be a stable form of society, and the chances are, considering the enourmous wealth of the world if scientifically exploited, that the slaves would be well-fed and contented'". ("Totalitarianism. A new story? An Old Story", by Laurence Lerner, Bloom's Modern Critical Interpretations: 1984, page 73)

But the reality of the situation, as Orwell later discovered and encapsulated in the party slogan, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, is simply that OUR SLAVERY IS THEIR FREEDOM TO DO WHAT THEY WILL WITH US. Thus there are no laws in Oceana. This is in keeping with the Crowleyian dogma: "Do As Thou Will Shall Be The Whole Of The Law". Even though there are no laws, or rather because there are no laws, the Thought Police can arrest anybody for any reason at any time to torture, rape, or vaporize at will as they wish.

Emblematically, the refutation and rebuke of this occult closedness and cruelty is the catholic Crucifix, which reaches out to all people, in all directions, to openly declare: "I love you this much!"; it's no secret, either, that Catholic faith, insofar as it is truly catholic, cannot contain exclusiveness, esotericism, or elitism. The problem of evil and its solution is signified in the crucifix. In contrast, the crossed and closed arms of the hexagram can only lead us in a circling spiral to the pit, or point, which is the Eye in the Triangle, the Eye of a perfect storm, i.e., dot in the circle, which is to say, as Orwell said so well by his book, to hell on earth.

Wurmbrand, Richard (1986) Marx & Satan, Living Sacrifice Book Company

[Aleister Crowley, pictured here, inducted Freemason George Orwell into the Qabbalistic magical fraternity the Golden Dawn, which is the private coven of the English branch of the Rothchilds, according to Fritz Springmeier. Crowley, a Freemason and main mystagogue of the O.T.O., is sometimes called the father of modern satanism; his "do your own thing" philosophy goes as far back as Rabelais (1494-1553), an "accepted Mason", and his abbey of Theleme. The Thelemites had only one motto: "Do What You Will." This philosophy explains why, in Orwell's 1984, there were no laws in Oceana, and yet it was the most monstrous tyranny: "In the vast majority of cases there was no trial, no report of the arrest. People simply disapeared..." (George Orwell, 1984, page 19) This lawlessness is based on the law of Theleme. To be free to do as they wish with the slaves, the Qabbalist cryptocrats covet lawlessness. Thus we are told that in Oceana, "nothing was illegal..." Why? To quote Crowley: "The Word of Sin is restriction." (Crowley, The Equinox, Vol. III, No. 10, page 31, WEISER BOOKS.) Is it perhaps this "freedom" from restriction that Freemason A.E. Waite alludes to with characteristic Qabalistic crypto-mockery, as quoted next?

"When the Masonic Temple shall shine over the whole universe, when its roof shall be the blue heaven, the poles its wall, the Throne and the Church its pillars, then will the powers of the earth themselves bow down before it, will deliver into our hands the domination of the world and bequeth that freedom to the people which we have laid up in store for them. May the Master of the world give us yet another hundred years, and then shall we attain that end so ardently desired" Freemason and Qabbalist magician Waite, "Waites' Encyclopedia", p. 74 of Volume I, as quoted in secondary source, "The Gods of the Lodge" by Reginald C. Haupt, Jr.

"One point of this future triangle will emerge out of the field of world governments, of politics and statemenship; another will appear out of the world religions, and a third out of the general field of world economics and finance." (Alice Baily, Masonic advocate, founder of Lucis Trust, formerly incorporated as Lucifer Publishing in 1924, which organization is in charge of the U.N.'s meditation room, according to Texe Marrs, in "Circle of Intrigue," page 177)

"At this same World Masonic Congress in 1917, the the general guidlines for a League of Nations were approved and adopted." (Foster Baily, husband of Alice Baily, 33rd Degree Freemason, in "Changing Esoteric Values," where he describes how world Masonry was instrumental in establishing both the League of Nations and the United Nations in the hope of establishing a world government. This is from secondary source Texe Marrs, "Circle of Intrigue" pages 150-152)

"Let the lower interest be betrayed to the higher, the particular benefit of any given country to the Commonwealth of the whole world." (Freemason & black witch, Aleister Crowely, as quoted in Blood At the Altar by Craig Heimbichner)

"I am for world-control of production and of trade and transport, for a world coinage, and the confederation of mankind. I am for the super-State, and not for any League." H.G. Wells, British spy, Freemason, and futurist, quoted in the introduction of The Open Conspiracy.

"All armies will be abolished, and there will be no more war. In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah." (David Ben-Gurion, Prime minister of Israel (and Freemason according to Texe Marrs), Look magazine.

In The Shape of Things to Come, H.G. Wells, who, like Orwell, was a Freemason and British intel agent, provided a similar scenario of a new order rising from the ashes of a world war, but unlke Orwell's dystopian vision, Wells was an optomistic advocate and believer in "military action used to speed and safeguard the transition to a peaceful world order", according to W. Warren Wagar. The "peaceful world order" is a euphemism for global government that would rise Phoenix-like from the ashes of yet another world war to supposedly render war obsolete. In the introduction to Wells' The Open Conspiracy, Warren Wagner wrote:

"He [Wells] described the emergence of a world state from the ashes of a second world war in The Shape of Things to Come and in the film based on that remarkable novel, Things to Come. He supplied the same scenario, essencially, in another novel published on the eve of the real World War Two, The Holy Terror (1939). And he continued his progaganda for Cosmopolis through most of the evil years of that all-too-real Armageddon, reviewing his plans and hopes one more time in Phoenix: A summary of the Inescapable Conditions of World Reorganization (1942)." [Brackets mine.]

Israel, founded in 1948, the same year that George Orwell completed and put out his famous novel, 1984; the title has nothing to do with a timetable but was derived by reversing the two end digits of the year 1948. Also: "To begin with, he did not know with any certainty that this was 1984", so it might just as well have been 1987 or 2084. (George Orwell, 1984, page 7)

"For the good of Masonry, generally, but the Jewish nation in particular." Royal Arch Degree of Freemasonry (Heimbichner, Craig, Blood On The Altar, page 83)

[It's interesting to note that IAO, the acronym used by Qabalist Crowelyites to refer to their god, appeared as the acronym of the Information Awareness Office that featured the All-Seeing Eye of Judeo-Freemasonry; this is no coincidence in my opinion. The Eye is the agency whereby none can seperate unseen, unhindered, or unharmed. Solomon's Seal signifies the process of being yoked to their god, IAO: "...I.A.O. as a magick formula it should be remarked is that it is essencially the formula of Yoga or meditation; in fact, of elementary mysticism in all its branches", according to http://www.sacred-texts/oto/aba/chap5.htm, where Crowley's Magick In Theory and Practice is located at the time of this writing. The word 'yoga', I'm told, means 'yoke', and yoga is the process whereby one is yoked with the god Siva, or Shiva, i.e., IAO, Bel, or Sol, the sun god, the cabbalistic number of which is 666, according to Godwin's Cabalistic Encyclopedia. Thus Jesus Christ said He came to bring a sword, which I take to mean one to cut assunder this yoking together of good with evil, and that He came to bring division, i.e., symbolically speaking, to sever the union of the triangles of Solomon's Seal, i.e., to seperate the wheat from the chaff, good from evil, truth from lie; He further told us that He came to give sight to blind, but also, to blind those who can see, and when He said this, He was speaking to the Pharisees, arguably practioners of the Kabbalah, whom Jesus called a "den of vipers".]

The Alex Jones interview with Russo, a friend of Rockerfeller's, illustrates this point also. Russo discovered how the feminist movement, for example, though promoted as an altruistic way to help exploited women, actually had a darker ulterior motive; 1) to help break up the family by moving women into the workforce and away from their children, thus making children more dependent upon Big Brother, i.e., public education, in their formative years; 2) bring women into the workforce to tax them and gain more revenue to fund Big Brother's black ops and other projects, not the least of which is simply to bribe citizens with various "free" benefits to support Big Brotherism. Russo, who had supported the feminism movement and considered it a noble endeavor, was shocked to learn that the the real ideology behind modern political events was simply to keep the pyramidal structure of society intact and preserve the pyramid of power.

"The last step was something that would happen in the Ministry of Love. He had accepted it. The end was contained in the beginning." (Orwell, 1984, page 159)

"For by thy sorceries were all nations decieved." Revelation 18:23
VISIT TALMUDUNMASKED.COM FOR MORE INFORMATION